I had no trouble reading the difficulties on either of these two screens.īoth smartwatches make navigation simple. To put it another way, it’s more pleasurable to wear.īoth smartwatches use AMOLED displays, which are incredibly vibrant and accessible to read both inside and outdoors. The Versa 3 is lighter and more compact than the Galaxy Watch 3. It’s also worth noting that the Galaxy Watch 3 comes in two sizes: 41mm and 45mm, instead of the Veras 3, which only comes in one model and size. Still, based on the materials used in both smartwatches, the Galaxy Watch 3 has a stainless steel casing with a leather strap, while the Versa 3 has an aluminum case with a silicone strap. ![]() I’m not sure what you consider a decent design. In terms of design, the Galaxy Watch 3 outperforms the Versa 3. The Galaxy Watch 3 is a more appealing smartwatch than the Versa 3. Is the charger for the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 wireless?.What are the several Samsung Galaxy design options available to me?.Is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 smartwatch worth it at its current price?.Is the Fitbit Versa 3 available in different colors?.Fitbit Versa 3 Fitness Tracking Features. ![]() Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm) Fitness Tracking Features. ![]() SMS, Calls, and App Notifications Management.Preset Sport Modes – The Galaxy Watch 3 has 90 pre-programmed sports modes against 20 on the Versa 3.Blood pressure tracking: The Galaxy Watch 3 has blood pressure monitoring, which isn’t available on the Versa 3.ECG TRACKING: The Galaxy Watch 3 has ECG tracking, which isn’t available on the Versa 3.Inbuilt GPS accuracy: Both smartwatches tracked my outside activities accurately.Accurate heart rate tracking – Both smartwatches tracked my heart rate consistently.Step Tracking Accuray – The Galaxy Watch 3 was more consistent than the Versa 3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |